- Anthony Scaramucci believes Bitcoin should be recognized as its own asset class.
- Bitcoin meets criteria such as uniqueness, store of value, and global adoption.
- He believes Bitcoin’s value should rise to match gold, a concept that many institutional investors already treat gold to.
The world of digital assets continues to stir heated debate, with Bitcoin consistently at the center. One voice worth noting is millionaire investor Anthony Scaramucci, founder of SkyBridge Capital, who recently made waves with his bold predictions about where the price of Bitcoin could (and should) be headed. As traditional finance wrestles with cryptocurrencies and investors hunt for the next big thing, Scaramucci argues that the current market undervalues Bitcoin—dramatically. In this article, we explore Scaramucci’s vision, the reasoning behind his forecast, how Bitcoin stacks up against gold, its global appeal, key challenges, and what it may take for his ambitious valuation of $500,000 to become reality.
Anthony Scaramucci isn’t just any investor. As the founder of SkyBridge Capital, his portfolio spans various asset classes, from hedge funds to alternative investments. Over the years, he’s become one of the more outspoken figures bridging the gap between Wall Street orthodoxy and the emergent world of cryptocurrency. His predictions carry weight not just because of his track record in finance, but because he frames his arguments in terms that are appealing—and sometimes provocative—to both institutional and retail investors.
Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset Class
One of Scaramucci’s key claims is that Bitcoin should be recognized as its own asset class. What does this mean? Simply put, if an investment fits certain criteria—uniqueness, recognition by institutional investors, store of value, global reach—it deserves a category separate from equities, bonds, or real estate. Scaramucci believes Bitcoin meets those criteria:
- Uniqueness: Bitcoin is decentralized, meaning no single government or entity controls it.
- Store of value: As fiat currencies suffer inflation and people lose faith in traditional monetary policy, Bitcoin is seen by many as a hedge.
- Global adoption: Bitcoin holders are distributed across borders far more evenly than many other assets.
Scaramucci’s argument is provocative: “You need to ask if Bitcoin is an asset class. If the answer is yes, then its value should rise to match gold.” He claims that many institutional investors already treat gold this way—and that Bitcoin deserves at least the same level of respect and valuation.
The Gold Benchmark
Why is gold such an often-used yardstick when valuing Bitcoin?
- Historical precedent: Gold has served as a store of value for thousands of years.
- Investor trust: Even when currencies fail or inflation soars, gold tends to retain value.
- Limited supply: Like Bitcoin, gold’s supply is constrained (though not as restricted as Bitcoin’s fixed cap).
Scaramucci’s point is that if institutional investors equate Bitcoin to gold, its market value must reflect that equivalency. Many large investors rely heavily on gold to hedge against risk. If they extend that function to Bitcoin, it could push demand—and price—much higher.
The Global Distribution Edge
Another layer of Scaramucci’s thesis: Bitcoin’s ownership is more globally diversified than many other major assets, such as U.S.-listed stocks or the S&P 500. He argues this widespread ownership gives Bitcoin long-term strength.
- Borderless asset: While U.S. companies are largely owned by U.S. and some international investors, Bitcoin holders are spread everywhere.
- Accessibility: Anyone with an internet connection can purchase Bitcoin. This inclusiveness drives up both usage and demand.
- Risk diversification: Governments with volatile currencies or restrictive policies often see greater adoption of Bitcoin. That acts as a pressure valve for economic and political instability.
Why $200,000 Is “Too Low”
Scaramucci believes that $200,000 per Bitcoin, a figure some have cited as a future possible high, is still far from where the price should be, if Bitcoin gains broader institutional acceptance as an asset class. Here are some reasons he thinks $200,000 is still undervaluing Bitcoin:
- Growing institutional interest: Pension funds, hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds have already dipped their toes in or are contemplating meaningful allocations.
- Scarce supply: The 21 million cap ensures that Bitcoin is not inflationary in the long term. Over time, as more coins get lost or remain dormant, the actually circulating supply tightens.
- Macroeconomic headwinds: Inflation, currency devaluation, and distrust in central banks are pushing more money toward non-traditional stores of value.
- Network effects: Bitcoin’s network—miners, nodes, wallets—is globally distributed and becoming more robust. The more adoption, the more secure and valuable the network becomes.
The $500,000 Prediction
Scaramucci doesn’t just say Bitcoin will be higher than $200,000—he sets his sights on $500,000 per coin. That’s more than double the “low end” of many bullish predictions. What conditions would need to align for his forecast to manifest?
| Factor | What It Means | Why It Matters |
| Widespread institutional adoption | Large funds and corporations allocate meaningful portions of portfolios to Bitcoin | Demand from big money can drive price exponentially |
| Regulatory clarity | Governments adopt clear, favorable laws without overly restrictive policies | Less uncertainty means more entrants from traditional finance |
| Custody solutions | Secure, scalable, and compliant systems for institutions to hold Bitcoin | Reduces friction and risk for large owners |
| Continued adoption in emerging markets | People in countries with weak currencies or banking systems turn to Bitcoin | Adds to cumulative demand and utility |
| Macroeconomic instability | Inflation, devaluation, geopolitical risk rise globally | Investors seek protection beyond traditional assets like bonds or fiat |
If these elements align, Scaramucci’s $500,000 target doesn’t sound so far-fetched. In many respects, his prediction is less about outright speculation, and more about what he sees as a reasonable valuation given Bitcoin’s inherent potential and current trajectory.
Anthony Scaramucci is making more than a speculative guess. He’s presenting a vision: that Bitcoin isn’t merely another volatile asset—it’s an emergent global standard, perhaps deserving of parity (or near-parity) with gold. By treating Bitcoin as its own asset class, widely distributed, scarce in supply, recognized by institutions, and ridden with macroeconomic tailwinds, Scaramucci argues that a price tag of $200,000 is far too modest—and that $500,000 may be closer to where Bitcoin truly belongs. Whether Bitcoin actually reaches that number depends on regulatory evolution, institutional commitment, adoption across geographies, and the continued maturation of infrastructure. But one thing is clear: Scaramucci’s bullish case adds fuel to a larger shift—from viewing Bitcoin as fringe speculation to treating it as a cornerstone in modern investment portfolios. If you’re watching Bitcoin, you’d do well to watch the signs: regulatory clarity, big money entering, usage in emerging economies. Those markers will hint whether Scaramucci is being overly optimistic—or if he’s drawing a map toward a bold, new financial reality.
Disclaimer: CryptopianNews shares this for learning and info only. It’s not meant to be financial or investment advice. Crypto markets change a lot and move quickly. Investing in them can be risky. You should always look into things yourself. Talk to a trained financial advisor before making any choices about investing.
- China’s First Regulated CNH Stablecoin Launches: AxCNH Debut - September 21, 2025
- Anthony Scaramucci Predicts Bitcoin Could Hit $500,000 - September 21, 2025
- Token Terminal Brings Cardano to 300K Institutions - September 20, 2025